Skip to content
Projects
Groups
Snippets
Help
This project
Loading...
Sign in / Register
Toggle navigation
P
paranoia
Overview
Overview
Details
Activity
Cycle Analytics
Repository
Repository
Files
Commits
Branches
Tags
Contributors
Graph
Compare
Charts
Issues
0
Issues
0
List
Board
Labels
Milestones
Merge Requests
0
Merge Requests
0
CI / CD
CI / CD
Pipelines
Jobs
Schedules
Charts
Wiki
Wiki
Snippets
Snippets
Members
Collapse sidebar
Close sidebar
Activity
Graph
Charts
Create a new issue
Jobs
Commits
Issue Boards
Open sidebar
ikcrm_common
paranoia
Commits
8d59c47a
Commit
8d59c47a
authored
Mar 10, 2017
by
Ben A. Morgan
Committed by
GitHub
Mar 10, 2017
Browse files
Options
Browse Files
Download
Plain Diff
Merge pull request #388 from patbl/changelog--fix-method-name
Changelog: Add missing bang in `#really_destroy!`
parents
dce2881f
23ed4c15
Show whitespace changes
Inline
Side-by-side
Showing
1 changed file
with
2 additions
and
2 deletions
+2
-2
CHANGELOG.md
+2
-2
No files found.
CHANGELOG.md
View file @
8d59c47a
...
...
@@ -52,7 +52,7 @@
*
`#destroyed?`
is no longer overridden. Use
`#paranoia_destroyed?`
for the existing behaviour.
[
Washington Luiz
](
https://github.com/huoxito
)
*
`#persisted?`
is no longer overridden.
*
ActiveRecord 4.0 no longer has
`#destroy!`
as an alias for
`#really_destroy`
.
*
ActiveRecord 4.0 no longer has
`#destroy!`
as an alias for
`#really_destroy
!
`
.
*
`#destroy`
will now raise an exception if called on a readonly record.
*
`#destroy`
on a hard deleted record is now a successful noop.
*
`#destroy`
on a new record will set deleted_at (previously this raised an error)
...
...
@@ -60,7 +60,7 @@
### Bug Fixes
*
Calling
`#destroy`
twice will not hard-delete records. Use
`#really_destroy`
if this is desired.
*
Calling
`#destroy`
twice will not hard-delete records. Use
`#really_destroy
!
`
if this is desired.
*
Fix errors on non-paranoid has_one dependent associations
## 2.0.5 (2015-01-22)
...
...
Write
Preview
Markdown
is supported
0%
Try again
or
attach a new file
Attach a file
Cancel
You are about to add
0
people
to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Cancel
Please
register
or
sign in
to comment