| Name | 
 Last commit 
 | 
Last Update | 
|---|---|---|
| cucumber | ||
| features | ||
| gemfiles | ||
| generators/paperclip | ||
| lib | ||
| rails | ||
| shoulda_macros | ||
| test | ||
| .gitignore | ||
| .travis.yml | ||
| Appraisals | ||
| CONTRIBUTING.md | ||
| Gemfile | ||
| Gemfile.lock | ||
| LICENSE | ||
| README.md | ||
| Rakefile | ||
| init.rb | ||
| paperclip.gemspec | 
It seems like that JRuby on travis-ci is broken[1], so we shouldn't test against it to reduce the false-positive result. I've run the test locally, and it passed just fine[2]. [1]: http://travis-ci.org/#!/thoughtbot/paperclip/builds/79181 [2]: https://gist.github.com/299686b412f9ad878e16
| Name | 
 Last commit 
 | 
Last Update | 
|---|---|---|
| cucumber | Loading commit data... | |
| features | Loading commit data... | |
| gemfiles | Loading commit data... | |
| generators/paperclip | Loading commit data... | |
| lib | Loading commit data... | |
| rails | Loading commit data... | |
| shoulda_macros | Loading commit data... | |
| test | Loading commit data... | |
| .gitignore | Loading commit data... | |
| .travis.yml | Loading commit data... | |
| Appraisals | Loading commit data... | |
| CONTRIBUTING.md | Loading commit data... | |
| Gemfile | Loading commit data... | |
| Gemfile.lock | Loading commit data... | |
| LICENSE | Loading commit data... | |
| README.md | Loading commit data... | |
| Rakefile | Loading commit data... | |
| init.rb | Loading commit data... | |
| paperclip.gemspec | Loading commit data... |