- 17 Feb, 2015 8 commits
-
-
This will allow to detect counter cached columns changes in callbacks like `after_destroy` or `after_commit on: :destroy`.
Sergey Alekseev committed -
My goal is Rails 4.2 support and it works well with Rails 4.2. I’m leaving this bug not fixed for Rails 4.1 for the time being.
Sergey Alekseev committed -
Sergey Alekseev committed
-
This is a workaround actually. Since `ActiveRecord::CounterCache.each_counter_cached_associations` is private. We shouldn’t use it. Proposals for the proper fix are welcome. The reason the previous version stopped working is `affected_rows` returns `0` at [active_record/counter_cache.rb#L142](https://github.com/rails/rails/blo b/ef99d4cd3ecc58a8c1484740b2fb5447dbda23ab/activerecord/lib/active_recor d/counter_cache.rb#L142). If you follow the method call you’ll find that it’s called at [active_record/persistence.rb#L486](https://github.com/rails/rails/blob/ ef99d4cd3ecc58a8c1484740b2fb5447dbda23ab/activerecord/lib/active_record/ persistence.rb#L486). Probably we’d better override the return value in `ActiveRecord::Relation.delete_all` at [active_record/relation.rb#L481](https://github.com/rails/rails/blob/ef9 9d4cd3ecc58a8c1484740b2fb5447dbda23ab/activerecord/lib/active_record/rel ation.rb#L481).
Sergey Alekseev committed -
Sergey Alekseev committed
-
https://github.com/radar/paranoia/blame/1b051ae78793f3b62297b5adbaa9c1d0 0e6726e0/README.md#L154
Sergey Alekseev committed -
http://edgeguides.rubyonrails.org/4_2_release_notes.html#active-record-d eprecations > Deprecated passing Active Record objects to .find or .exists?. Call id on the objects first. Commits in Rails: https://github.com/rails/rails/commit/d92ae6ccca3bcfd73546d612efaea01127 0bd270 https://github.com/rails/rails/commit/d35f0033c7dec2b8d8b52058fb8db495d4 9596f7 https://github.com/rails/rails/commit/c0609dd0f0f0de604ac1ffeffdf5e3e0e7 356b35
Sergey Alekseev committed -
Update README about rails3 branch
Ryan Bigg committed
-
- 16 Feb, 2015 3 commits
-
-
Update README.md
Ryan Bigg committed -
Jim committed
-
Add a mention for https://github.com/radar/paranoia/issues/109#issuecomment-74455252
Jim committed
-
- 15 Feb, 2015 1 commit
-
-
Dmitry Babenko committed
-
- 09 Feb, 2015 1 commit
-
-
I think this advice is misleading for most datasets and most RDBMS this is not necessary, and as per #206 doesn't even work. I have moved it to the wiki https://github.com/radar/paranoia/wiki/Custom-sentinel-values
John Hawthorn committed
-
- 24 Jan, 2015 2 commits
-
-
John Hawthorn committed
-
John Hawthorn committed
-
- 22 Jan, 2015 19 commits
-
-
This is a test for a case when a model has a has_one association with an after_validation callback, and we have failed validation. Paranoia will attempt to touch the deleted_at column on the child record that has been built but not saved. Fixes #180
Nick Anderson committed -
John Hawthorn committed
-
John Hawthorn committed
-
This allows testing rails 4.0 on ruby 2.2
John Hawthorn committed -
John Hawthorn committed
-
John Hawthorn committed
-
John Hawthorn committed
-
John Hawthorn committed
-
We no longer have different behaviour between AR versions.
John Hawthorn committed -
We shouldn't be overriding this. soft-deleted objects are still persisted.
John Hawthorn committed -
The default implementation is already destroy || raise
John Hawthorn committed -
John Hawthorn committed
-
John Hawthorn committed
-
John Hawthorn committed
-
Thanks @kidlab
John Hawthorn committed -
John Hawthorn committed
-
John Hawthorn committed
-
There was a change in ActiveRecord#update_columns on latest rails so now it checks for `destroyed?` instead of `persisted?`. Paranoia can't override `destoyed?` like this anymore otherwise `update_columns` will always raise: ActiveRecord::ActiveRecordError: cannot update a destroyed record see https://github.com/rails/rails/commit/0f99aa615e11c50cc64b567f54cf64f59108c5e5
Washington Luiz committed -
John Hawthorn committed
-
- 21 Jan, 2015 1 commit
-
-
John Hawthorn committed
-
- 19 Jan, 2015 5 commits
-
-
Shreyas Agarwal committed
-
John Hawthorn committed
-
To ensure that we are using the association _type in our scope.
John Hawthorn committed -
John Hawthorn committed
-
If the association object is a has_one relationship with an :as option, it will have a type attribute (see https://github.com/rails/docrails/blob/master/activerecord/lib/active_record/reflection.rb#L280). If this type attributes is present, that will be the type column on the polymorphic model. The foreign key can be found as an attribute on the association object.
Patrick Koperwas committed
-